
Explorations Class #26 Discussion
The Second Coming
With this session we conclude our exploration
of the major doctrines of the JW's. There are a number of issues
we could explore, including church authority, the details of the
millennium, refusal to observe birthdays and holidays, refusal to
accept blood transfusions and so on, but these are peripheral issues
having at best little to do with the gospel. They have been covered
well by other authors in much more detailed works.
Our task is to review the resurrection of Christ,
and the effects of the JW refusal to allow scripture to speak on
the issue. We saw earlier that the JW hermeneutical circle states
that Jesus is not God, because God cannot die. This makes Jesus into
a spirit being who became man, died and was resurrected. But, since
his life as a man was the payment for Adam's sin, his physical life
could not be taken up again. Instead, he was resurrected as a spirit
being. This spirit being was seen only by the disciples, and was
taken up into heaven. Because of his nature as a spirit, the second
coming was spiritual, and happened in 1914. The translation of the
Bible used by the JW's has been done to avoid allowing any "scriptural" contradiction
to this logical construct. As we will see, even in the NWT, this
construct falls apart when examined.
One peripheral issue is that of the physical cross.
JW's teach that Jesus died on a torture stake where both hands are
stretched overhead and secured with a single nail. While this seems
a trivial issue, it serves as a JW distinctive, allowing them to
have another item that they "have right" contrary to the
rest of the world. Cults grasp such straws to ensure their identity.
Historically, it is clear that the cross has been taught throughout
history, and a torture stake is a modern invention theologically.
But, since the Greek does allow this translation, appeals to it fail.
However, even in the NWT, the issue is clear, since Thomas asks to
see the prints of the nails (plural) in Jesus' hands (Q1). A cross
would use a separate nail for each hand, while the torture stake
used a single nail for both.
To support the JW idea that Jesus was resurrected
as a spirit, they point to supernatural abilities he had after the
resurrection. He appeared behind locked doors, vanished and reappeared.
This is confirmed as evidence of being a spirit by 1 Peter 3:18 where
Jesus is reported to have been "raised in the spirit." Such
a facile "proof" of his spirit nature fails when we consider
other events in scripture. Before the cross, Jesus walked on water
(Q2). We may also note that after the ascension, Philip was miraculously
transported from the baptism of the Ethiopian eunuch to the town
of Azotus. These miracles point out that God is able to do the same
sort of miracles with men that were performed with Christ. The nature
of the man is not at issue, but the power of God is.
Jesus made direct statements before the cross
of how he would be resurrected (Q3). Referring to his body, he said
that if it were destroyed, in three days he would raise it up again.
In the NWT quote (John 10:17-18), we find that Jesus has authority
to receive his soul again. Since the JW's correctly understand the
state of the dead, this can only mean his life, intact with his body.
Finally, (Q4) we see that the NT clearly states that Jesus was resurrected
as a man. Jesus himself tells the disciples that "a spirit does
not have flesh and bones just as YOU behold that I have." (NWT)
Attempting to translate away all evidence contrary to their doctrines
is impossible. When we follow this line of inquiry to its logical
end (Q5), we find that Jesus is a man in heaven. The Lord swore to
David that the fruit of body would sit on God's throne. Paul confirms
that "in him the fullness of divine quality dwells bodily." (Col
2:9, NWT) Our intercessor is a man.
We now turn our attention from specifics of Jesus'
resurrection to specifics of our resurrection. Because Revelation
is written in symbolic language, it is ready territory for those
who would seek to support their own interpretation. All that is required
is an audience that doesn't look carefully at details. Thus, when
Russell looked at the 144,000 of Rev 7, he saw a small group of specially
favored saints (Q6). These were declared to be the saints of the
early church and a few specific "elect," of which he was
one. These would reign forever with Jesus in heaven. Unfortunately,
when details are ignored, they come back to bite the unwary interpreter.
Rev 7 places the 144,000 on earth, not in heaven. Further, when the
passage is examined carefully, we find that John "heard" the
number 144,000, with specific details as to which tribes they were
drawn, but when he turned around, he "saw" that they were
actually a great multitude (great crowd, NWT) (Q7). Thus, the two
descriptions, which might appear to be separate groups to the unwary,
turn out to be different ways of describing the saints. The tribes
are listed because of various specific historical characteristics
of those tribes which correspond to certain characteristics of some
saints. (We note that the list is different from any other Biblical
list, denying the incorrect idea of them being the saved from among
the Jews [an error also rejected by the JW's].)
The idea of two groups of saints is further denied
when we examine the location of the great crowd in Rev 19 (Q8). Here
the saints which Russell placed on the earth are pictured in heaven.
His justification for the 144,000 being in heaven ("purchased
from the earth" Q9) falls apart when we see that the "purchase
price" is the propitiation John tells us is for the entire earth.
That is, all saints have been purchased, not just 144,000. "Purchased
from the earth" is a metaphor for the fact that Jesus paid the
price to rescue us from the death due to all on the earth. It says
nothing about where the saints will live.
Other lines of evidence show that there is only
one group of saints. John 10:16, which JW's read to say that there
are two groups of saints (other sheep), ends by saying that all sheep
would become one flock (Q10). The greater blessings alleged to accrue
to the 144,000 (Q11) turn out to be a bad dream, because while JW's
place the 144,000 in heaven forever, God will dwell with men on the
earth. This would give the great crowd a greater blessing than the
144,000. When we examine the Sermon on the Mount (Q12) and Paul's
teachings, we find only one group of saints in view. Yes, there are
two groups of people, but they are the saints and the wicked. All
believers are members of one body. As for the JW belief that only
the 144,000 are "born again", even the NWT tells us that
only those who are born again will enter the kingdom at all (Q13).
And every believer is born of God, not just a favored few.
Our final step on this trip is to examine the
JW doctrine of the second coming. This is said to be a spiritual "presence" only,
since Jesus was resurrected as a spirit. We have already dealt with
that issue, so we have no need to revisit it now. It is said that
the "parousia" (Greek "presence/revealing") was
the time when Jesus received his kingdom. Then he was able to come
here in an invisible presence to begin reigning. This was to come
at the end of the "times of the nations." Space does not
permit a full discussion of this error, but certain facts about it
can be explored.
The first is the way that 1914 came to be determined
to be the date. JW's identify 607 BC as the time of the destruction
of Jerusalem. We may note that from the outset, this time is in error.
Archeological evidence is absolutely conclusive that Nebuchadnezzar
became king of Babylon in September of 605 BC, a full two years after
the JW chronology identifies the destruction of Jerusalem by Nebuchadnezzar.
That happened in 586 BC, twenty-one years after the time the JW's
identify for it. As we will see shortly, the JW's are off by far
more than twenty-one years.
In each of Daniel's prophecies, there is a clear
indication of the fact that it is a prophecy for the future, except
for this one, which is specifically for Nebuchadnezzar. Rather than
having any indication of an application to the future (Q14), the
interpretation of the dream of Dan 4 states "Your kingdom will
be sure to you after you know that the heavens are ruling." (Dan
4:26 NWT) Yet the JW's take the seven years of madness to refer to
2,520 years of rule of the earth by Satan, with Jesus assuming rule
of the kingdom at the end of this time period. The way they calculate
this time is by taking the 3 1/2 years of Dan 7:25 and Rev 12:6,
then combining it with the 1,260 days or 42 months of Rev 11:2-3.
They are not alone in this arithmetic. The bulk of modern prophetic
interpreters do this arithmetic to allow them to "deduce" that
in prophecy a year is 360 days long. Unfortunately for these interpreters,
the Jews never had a year 360 days long. Not only that, there is
no evidence that the Jews maintained a separate "prophetic calendar" with
360 day years. The Jewish year was 353-355 days long, with leap years
thrown in to keep the months in sync with the seasons. This made
leap years 383-385 days long.
Interpreters who propose 360 day years also ignore
the fact that there is evidence in the book of Daniel that indicates
that the length of the year was to be understood with the information
available to Daniel (Q15). In Dan 9:25, Daniel is told that he is
to "know and discern" the length of a prophetic time span.
Since the only year Daniel knew was the ordinary Jewish year, that
is the length of the year in prophecy. The entire schema of 360 day
years depends on scriptural arithmetic which was not possible until
Revelation was written about AD 94, some 60 years after the prophecy
in Dan 9:25 ended.
It is curious that the JW's get the year-for-a-day
principle right, but apply it incorrectly and inconsistently. First,
they use 360 day years to figure out the number of years from the
destruction of Jerusalem to Jesus' "presence." If they
were consistent, they would use 360 day years for the 2,520 years,
but they do not, using instead standard solar years of 365 1/4 days.
This places the "presence" in 1914, based on a 607 BC date
for the destruction of Jerusalem. If they were to use 360 day years,
the "presence" would begin in 1878. On the other hand,
if they used solar years to calculate the length of the delay, they
would get 2,557 years, which would then end in 1951. Of course, if
they got the time of the destruction of Jerusalem (586 BC) correct,
they would get 1899 for consistent 360 day years, 1935 for the mixed
arithmetic they use, and 1972 if they used consistent solar years.
When we look at all of these possibilities, then look at the world
around us, we find that there is absolutely no discernible difference
in the world as to the presence or absence of sin at these dates.
Put bluntly, there is no conceivable reason to identify any of these
years as the fulfillment of any prophecy. There is no scriptural
basis for choosing the end points they do, and there is no scriptural
basis for the arithmetic they choose.
|
Length of "Prophecy" in Years
|
360 Day Years
(supposed "Jewish") |
2,520 Total Years |
365 1/4 Day Years
(standard solar) |
2,557 Total Years |
|
Ending Date of Daniel 4 "Prophecy"
|
Length
of Prophetic Year |
Length
of Actual Year |
Starting
Year |
Ending
Year |
360 Days |
360 Days |
607 B.C. |
1878 |
| |
|
586 B.C. |
1899 |
360 Days |
365 1/4 Days |
607 B.C. |
1914 |
| |
|
586 B.C. |
1935 |
365 1/4 Days |
365 1/4 Days |
607 B.C. |
1951 |
| |
|
586 B.C. |
1972 |
As a final note, we should consider the JW typological
argument. Essentially this relies on the concept of types and antitypes,
where the "type" is a foreshadowing of the "antitype" to
come. In this respect, the Passover lamb was killed signifying the
release of the Jews from the bondage of Egypt (Ex 12). This lamb
was the type of Jesus who was the antitype of the Passover (1 Cor
5:7). In other words, the type pointed forward to the antitype. There
is a tight correspondence between type and antitype. The Passover
lamb was to be spotless, without blemish of any kind. Similarly,
Christ was our perfect Passover lamb. Looking to the JW use of Nebuchadnezzar's
madness, we see the story of a heathen king being cut off and later
restored. JW's try to make this into the type for the cutting off
of the kingdom of God from the earth and its later restoration. This
violates every principle of typology. First, God's kingdom was never
removed from the earth. As long as there were faithful people such
as Daniel, God's kingdom was always present, although not necessarily
with physical theocratic rule. But much more important, the rule
of an oppressor of the Jews is not the type to which the ruler of
the liberator of spiritual Judah corresponds. He is the exact opposite.
Thus it is impossible to properly apply Dan 4 to identify the time
when the kingdom of God would be restored. Of course, one final point
dooms this attempt to identify the time of Jesus' coming. The prophecy
of Nebuchadnezzar's madness was given some fifteen or so years after
the destruction of Jerusalem. No Biblical prophecy which defines
a specific time period was given after the period has begun.
When we look at the JW schema, we are struck by
the fact that the "presence" is far different from what
Jesus told us to expect (Q16). Jesus told us that his coming would
shine from the east to the west like lightning. An invisible presence
doesn't match that description. And as Jesus said while specifically
answering when his kingdom would be inaugurated, we are not to know
the times or epochs. This statement stands as a specific contradiction
of the JW schema. We should note that the NWT does not change this
passage.
The only idea which allows the JW schema to work
at all is the idea that Jesus was resurrected as a spirit. Once again,
they twist the scripture to suit their purposes. In John 14, Jesus
told the disciples that he would send the Holy Spirit after he left.
He then pointed out that there would come a time when the world would
not see him, but that the disciples would see him (Q18). At that
time they would clearly understand his divinity. This was clearly
fulfilled in the forty days between the resurrection and the ascension.
This is repeated in John 16.
After the fulfillment of Jesus' statement, he
was taken up in the clouds (Q19). JW's insist that the clouds denote
invisibility, since he eventually was lost to view. Once again, the
JW's stretch to twist the scripture to their ends. The text notes
that the disciples "watched" Jesus ascend. This requires
that when Jesus will return, we will "watch" him descend.
Again, in Rev 1:7, the JW's are forced to ignore the plain language
of scripture by making "seeing" into a purely spiritual "discernment" (Q20).
Multiple passages, including the NWT versions, state very clearly
that the second coming will be a very obvious, visible physical event.
It will be so obvious, that the wicked will call for the rocks to
fall on them. Nothing in 1914 comes remotely close.
A further attempt to get around this wealth of
testimony to the visible nature of the return is to change "appearing" in
various texts into "manifestation." Thus, the "manifestation" can
be made out as a spiritual event, not a physical one. However (Q21),
when the evidence is gathered, we find that Jesus was "manifested" to
mankind during his ministry. This was not a primarily spiritual event,
but was a physical appearing. Thus, there is no basis for treating "manifestation" as
anything other than simple physical presence.
Continuing tenaciously along their erroneous path,
the JW's state that the spiritual presence of Jesus began in 1914
when he received his kingdom. Once again (Q22), Jesus' own words
show their error. He promised the disciples that he would always
be present (Matt 28:19-20). If his presence only came in 1914, then
Jesus lied to his disciples.
One final item of proof comes before us. The kingdom
of God will be with men on earth (Q23). The entire schema of two
groups and different earthly/heavenly kingdoms is simply a product
of the fertile imagination of Charles Taze Russel. God will dwell
with men forever on earth. There will only be two groups of people,
the saved and the lost. There will not be two groups of saints.
We must ponder (Q24) just what it is that JW's
have done to the hope of the cross. I find myself at a loss for words
to describe the mishmash they have served up as salvation stew. Instead
of a marvelous gift of love given to all the faithful, Jesus' sacrifice
becomes a simple financial transaction, where a debt is paid. Each
claimant then must work to elevate himself in the kingdom. But this
marvelous kingdom, with no more tears, is turned into some invisible "presence" which
can be seen to have no substantial effect on sin. Is this a Savior
worth serving?
Because of the insistence on placing man's logic
above God's infinite knowledge and grace, JW's have made God into
man's image, just as have every group of pagans and apostate Christians.
Greek issues regarding the language of the second
coming.
"Epiphaneia" translates as "manifestation" or "appearing." It
is found in 2 Thess 2:8, 1 Tim 6:14, 2 Tim 4:1, and Titus 2:13. It
was commonly used by the pagan Greeks to describe the visible form
of a divine being.
"Phaneroo" is related to epiphaneia,
and means to show or reveal oneself. It is found in Col 3:4, 1 Peter
5:4, 1 John 2:28 and 1 John 3:2. For comparison see John 1:30-31,
Heb 9 26, and 1 Pet 1:20.
"Erchomai" is the common Greek word
for "to come." It is found in Matt 16:27-28; 24:30, 42,
44; 25:13, 31; 26:64, Mark 13:26; 14:62, Luke 9:26; 12:40; 21:27,
Acts 1:11, 1 Cor 4:5; 11:26, 2 Thess 1:10, Rev 1:7; 22:7, 12, 20.
1) Christians wait and hope for the apokalupsis
(1 Cor 1:7, 1 Peter 1:13) and the epiphaneia (Titus 2:13) and must
be patient until the parousia (James 5:7-8)
2) Both the apokalupsis and the parousia are
equated with "the day of the Lord (Jesus Christ)" (1
Cor 1:7, 2 Thess 2:1, 2 Peter 3:4, 9-12)
3) The words apokalupsis, epiphaneia, erchomai,
and parousia are all used of Christ's coming to judge the wicked
(Matt 24:50-51; 25:31-46, 2 Thess 1:7-10; 2:8).
4) Christ's "coming" (erchomai),
his parousia, and the day of the Lord, all refer to that future
judgment that will "come like a thief" on the wicked
(Matt 24:42-44, Luke 12:38-40, 1 Thess 5:1-4, 2 Peter 3:10, Rev
16:15).
5) Christians are exhorted to pursue blamelessness
and holiness in expectation of the epiphaneia and parousia of Christ
(1 Thess 3:13; 5:23, 1 Tim 6:11-14, 2 Tim 4:1-5, 2 Peter 3:9-12,
1 John 2:28).
6) Believers will be gathered together to be
with Christ when he comes (erchomai) and at his parousia Matt 24:31,
1 Thess 4:16-17, 2 Thess 2:1).
The inauguration of Christ's kingdom.
Acts 4:25-27; 13:32-33, Heb 1:3-5; 5:5 all explicitly
apply Psalm 2 to identify Jesus exaltation to the throne at His ascension.
Matt 28:18-20, Rev 2:26-27 explicitly state that
Jesus already had all authority of the kingdom.
 
|